The #blacklivesmatter movement, now “The Movement for Black Lives,” recently got a spiffy new website, just in time for the final 100 days of the presidential election. Hoping to stay relevant and look more professional, they now have an interactive policy platform that tries to intellectualize their demands. The site is very opaque about who runs it or built it, other than noting it is the effort of activists from 50 different organizations. Not that we don’t know (((who))) is behind this site—his name probably rhymes with Sorge Georos. Here is their opening statement, which would be widely panned as racist if it came from our side:
Black humanity and dignity requires black political will and power. In response to the sustained and increasingly visible violence against Black communities in the U.S. and globally, a collective of more than 50 organizations representing thousands of Black people from across the country have come together with renewed energy and purpose to articulate a common vision and agenda. We are a collective that centers and is rooted in Black communities, but we recognize we have a shared struggle with all oppressed people; collective liberation will be a product of all of our work.
The key feature of the website is an expansive list of six demands, or categories of demands, that these third world tribalists have for the United States:
End the war on Black people — Calls for an “immediate end to the criminalization and dehumanization of Black youth,” ending the use of criminal history in financial and housing decision making, ending deportations of Black illegal immigrants, hamstringing the police, and “an end to the war on Black trans, queer and gender nonconforming people.” In other words, stop enforcing the law. Reminder that half of all murders in the United States are the work of these people. How about ending the war on civilization? Oh, and a friendly reminder that a majority of Blacks are opposed to LGBTBBQ shit. [More]
Reparations — Here the movement demands gibs as recompense for “colonialism to slavery through food and housing redlining, mass incarceration, and surveillance.” Demanding gibs because of muh slavery is not new. Mixing the traditional demands for free shit with Sandernista progressivism, they want free and full lifetime access to education and forgiveness for all student debt, “guaranteed minimum livable income” for dindus (which they will just burn through), and educational reparations in the form of “mandated public school curriculums that critically examine the political, economic, and social impacts of colonialism and slavery.” As if that isn’t already taught and exalted as a high-status way of thinking. [More]
Invest-Divest — The site basically demands we defund the police to pay for gibs. In addition, anyone in jail for drugs or prostitution should be released and given reparations. What could go wrong? It’s not a lot of people jailed for drug offenses also had other charges. The government also needs to gib universal healthcare with “culturally competent services for all people, specific services for queer, gender nonconforming, and trans people.” They also want divestment from fossil fuels and cuts in military spending, so more money can go towards gibs. I guess they don’t realize that the mission of the US military is to provide employment opportunities and leadership training to women and non-Whites. But hey, by all means let’s defund another one of the post-White government’s social experiments. [More]
Economic justice — Yes, gibs again. I never realized how many ways you can say gibs in a single agenda. A “radical and sustainable redistribution of wealth,” “federal and state job programs,” public control over all natural resources, and “financial support of Black alternative institutions…” They’re also against the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which is nice I guess. My favorite gibs demand is this one: “Through tax incentives, loans and other government directed resources, support the development of cooperative or social economy networks to help facilitate trade across and in Black communities globally. All aid in the form of grants, loans or contracts to help facilitate this must go to Black led or Black supported networks and organizations as defined by the communities.” Just straight-up gib us money anywhere we are in the world to do stuff with. This would be considered a scam if anyone else tried to do it, setting up private organizations for the explicit purpose of collecting public money to funnel towards an ethnic group. [More]
Community control — This section demands that power be devolved to “communities” and calls for them to control policing and education. In practice it sounds like it would be mob rule, and by a mob that is notoriously high time-preference. For police departments, it means having “the power to hire and fire officers, determine disciplinary action, control budgets and policies, and subpoena.” Since we know law enforcement has a disparate impact on communities that produce a lot of criminals, anyone who actually tries to enforce the law will be fired, and anarcho-tyranny will reign wherever “the community” has control. Fantastic. In terms of schooling, they want “an end to the privatization of education,” and “democratic school boards and community control of curriculum, hiring, firing and discipline policies.” If you can’t see this going to shit immediately, you are an idiot or a sociology major. Curriculums will be dumbed down to make sure no dindu ever fails a class and childhood education will entirely be in the hands of third-worldist marxists. I’m not entirely sure what they intend to accomplish by shutting down private education, but I imagine parents who can afford it will fight tooth and nail to keep their children from attending public schools in dindustan. [More]
Political power — “We envision a remaking of the current U.S. political system in order to create a real democracy where Black people and all marginalized people can effectively exercise full political power.” Real democracy means giving minorities “full political power,” goyim. To achieve this they want to make voting completely effortless and open to literally everyone “through universal voter registration, automatic voter registration, pre-registration for 16-year-olds, same day voter registration, voting day holidays, enfranchisement of formerly and presently incarcerated people, local and state resident voting for undocumented people, and a ban on any disenfranchisement laws.” Such policies would help bring about the permanent left-wing voting majority our enemies desire, which would be an anti-White majority. And it would make sure high time-preference, low information voters have as few barriers as possible to pulling the lever to receive more gibs. This section also calls for an “end to the criminalization of Black political activity,” and if you think that means letting violent criminals walk free because they are Black, you are correct! One of the sub-demands is that Black Panther, convicted felon, and FBI’s Most Wanted List entry Assata Shakur be removed from “international terrorist lists”and have the bounty on her head called off. She dindu nothing. Gotta give some caaahredit though for being woke af on COINTELPRO. Was not expecting to see that mentioned on a dindu website. Sheeit. [More]
There are some interesting ideas in here. For example, I would tactically be in favor of afrocentric devolution in education and policing as the site suggests, but only if we also implemented segregation, so we could keep the disastrous impact of Black supremacy out of White areas. In other words, we aren’t going to send White cops into the jungle and we aren’t going to let you run, or ruin, our schools. On the other hand, we know segregated societies are unstable and will be under immense pressure domestically and internationally to abolish themselves. They ask for de facto separation now but they would never truly let us have it. They want us out of their affairs but to have the right to freely intervene in ours. It is a bad faith proposal to demand both Black autonomy and all the benefits of access to White people and capital.
The problem is that “The Movement for Black Lives” wants the best of both worlds. They want to rent-seek off us for gibs, but they also want full—political, cultural, economic, social, legal, educational etc.—control over their affairs while being exempt from White standards of civility and quality of life. They want to be formally made into a protected class, a designated oppressed group, one that is eligible for as much gibs as it asks for. They want a divorce, but they also want alimony and child support—forever—as well as the right to keep living in our house and eating our food.
Notably they’ve dropped any kind of rhetoric about “smashing White supremacy” or “ending Whiteness” because it makes for bad optics. The goal here is to appeal as broadly to the social justice crowd as possible, many of whom are goyim. If they sound too regressive, it would not only dissuade allies of Whiteness but actually fuel the rise of counter-movements. But make no mistake, the ideology is still the same. It is anti-White third-worldism, and the end result will be anarcho-tyranny. They are blatantly calling for our economic exploitation, cultural erasure, political disenfranchisement, and abandonment by law enforcement, which will in turn allow their more aggressive elements to revenge themselves upon us with impunity while their political leaders do so through the courts and tax code. All this in a country where we are projected to become a minority, and from the looks of it a hated one.
It’s unlikely we will see major elements of this platform implemented any time soon. Clinton has always positioned herself as a believer in incremental change, so even if she wins in November she won’t immediately pursue a blacklivesmatter agenda. In fact, given the ongoing pivot towards mestizos, Democrats in general might be less interested in ramming through an afrocentric policy platform in order to win votes.
On the other hand we can’t just write this off as crazy ramblings that we should ignore. For one thing, blacklivesmatter has made major metapolitical inroads among Blacks, as polling suggests most of them hold it in high regard and agree with it. And for us to hope that mestizos clamoring for their own gibs from the Democratic party derail afrocentric gibs initiatives is not really a source of comfort beyond schadenfreude. We should exploit fissures like this to the extent that we can, and as always take our own side in tribal conflicts. Certainly everyone else is.