Shortly before Obama administration official and Clinton sycophant Tom Perez upset the DNC grassroots’ favorite Keith Ellison, the infamous Jewish lawyer Alan Dershowitz penned a vicious ultimatum.
Dershowitz is a medium level celebrity who donates medium level dollars to the Democratic party, yet seldom comments on its activities or policies. But in the case of Ellison, who often votes against giving away no-strings attached American tax-payer money to Israel, Dershowitz states plainly that his racial loyalty comes before his party.
My loyalty to my country and my principles and my heritage exceeds any loyalty to my party. I will urge other like-minded people — centrist liberals — to follow my lead and quit the Democratic Party if Ellison is elected chairman. We will not be leaving the Democratic Party we have long supported. The Democratic Party will be leaving us!
In the context of the article, Dershowitz’s country is Israel, his heritage is Jewish, and his principles are his belief that the Jewish race is chosen to reign supreme over mankind. The last public disavowal by Dershowitz came in his cutting of ties with Black Lives Matter, not for their anti-white racism or calls for attacks on police, but because they weren’t sufficiently pro-Israel.
Why the vast majority of non-Jewish Democrats need to accomodate Dershowitz’s Zionism has no politically correct answers, but the top plutocrats in the Democratic party already responded long ago. After the Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Congress and billionaire donor Haim Saban grumbled about Ellison, Obama reached deep into his bench to unearth Tom Perez (on December 15th, two weeks after Jewish groups began complaining about the previously unopposed Ellison) to placate these Jewish oligarchs.
Barenaked Jewish Conspiracy
Most rank-and-file Democrats are still reeling from what transpired last Saturday. The barenaked triangulation between the Jewish donors (Saban), Jewish advocacy groups (ADL, AJC), and the Jewish mainstream media (most which uncritically published largely anonymous hearsay Ellison) to block Ellison exposed the DNC activist wing and base as little more than an impotent charade meant to occasionally harass white people and Donald Trump.
Disgraced Interim chair Donna Brazile’s last minute announcement that the DNC chair vote would be made anonymous added more fuel to the fire. Using “spotty internet service” as an alibi, the party machine increased the opacity of the already questionable process. The real reason was to take accountability away from delegates who voted for Tom Perez. By hiding these individuals, the grassroots would not be able to attack them at the ballot box and their links to Jewish hedge fund billionaires would be kept a secret.
The Democrats present themselves as the party of the little guy, but in practice, they are even more corrupt and beholden to the Jewish oligarchs than the GOP. Trump was able to break through the barriers the GOP put in place, largely because the hardened Jewish core within Republican infrastructure was considerably weaker than what it is in the Democratic Party.
“Never Trump” and “Never Ellison”
The dying expression of Jewish hegemony over the Republican Party, “Never Trump,” was unable to consolidate enough power to defeat the President. Among the Democrats, they have succeeded in holding steadfast, but at what cost?
While the phenomenons are on two different sides of the street, “Never Ellison” and “Never Trump” follow similar trajectories. Both represent the “special interests” (read: Jews) against the interests of the public. For the DNC, the point of contention is whether Jews are entitled to an American bolstered state that practices ethnic genocide, racial eugenics and apartheid, to which the majority of Democratic voters say ‘No.’
The Jewish wing of the RNC fought similarly as hard to keep perpetual war, limitless global capitalism, social safety net cuts, and open borders immigration as Republican party issues even though the white working class base hates all of these planks. But the neo-con Jews were weaker and Trump was stronger. They won’t allow anything similar to happen to the Democratic Party.
Bernie Sanders, the Jewish leader of the controlled opposition, continues to be a willing patsy, encouraging his angry supporters to stick with the party even as it continues to practice malfeasance like this.
Democrats Crash Into The Jewish Question
The most interesting development to come out of the successful (((“Never Ellison”))) campaign is that ordinary Democrats know exactly what just transpired, but will they have the integrity to say so?
Some liberals, including a fairly principled Jew (Glenn Greenwald), are already hinting at what they may be discussing behind closed doors. In an analysis on the day before the ballots were cast, Glenn Greenwald had no qualms in speaking candidly.
But there’s an uglier and tawdrier aspect to this. Just over two weeks after Ellison announced, the largest single funder of both the Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign — the Israeli-American billionaire Haim Saban — launched an incredibly toxic attack on Ellison, designed to signal his veto. “He is clearly an anti-Semite and anti-Israel individual,” pronounced Saban about the African-American Muslim congressman, adding: “Keith Ellison would be a disaster for the relationship between the Jewish community and the Democratic Party.”
Saban has a long history not only of fanatical support for Israel — “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel,” he told the New York Times in 2004 about himself — but also an ugly track record of animus toward Muslims. As The Forward gently put it, he is prone to “a bit of anti-Muslim bigotry,” including when he said Muslims deserve “more scrutiny” and “also called for profiling and broader surveillance.” In 2014, he teamed up with right-wing billionaire Sheldon Adelson to push a pro-Israel agenda. In that notorious NYT profile, he attacked the ACLU for opposing Bush/Cheney civil liberties assaults and said: “On the issues of security and terrorism I am a total hawk.”
There’s no evidence that Saban’s attack on Ellison is what motivated the White House to recruit an opponent. But one would have to be indescribably naïve about the ways of Washington to believe that such a vicious denunciation by one of the party’s most influential billionaire funders had no effect at all.
As both Chang and Vox’s Jeff Stein have argued, the fact that DNC chair is a largely functionary position, with little real power over party policy or messaging, is all the more reason to throw Sanders supporters a symbolic bone. If Democrats were smart, this would be the perfect opportunity to capture that energized left-wing movement without having to make any real concessions on what matters most to them: loyalty to their corporate donor base.
I believe that the election of Perez over Ellison is the beginning of the end of the Democratic party, even though the DNC chairmanship has little power to begin with. Jews are looking to use anti-Trump animosity they manufacture in their press to hold this coalition of contradictions (blacks, Muslims, illegal Mexicans, transsexuals, socialists, and Jewish billionaires coordinating them) together, but this transparent power play may just be the catalyst for a split.
It’s safe to say that this rigged election, to quote Trump, will trigger a gradual walk-out that the Zion-Press will try and cover up. The true nature of this split will be seen in 2018 and 2020. A corrupt and incompetent party administered entirely by black women and controlled with an iron fist by Jews can only go so far in pushing the patience of white people (even diehard liberals).