Home / Politics / Alt-RINOs, Those Who Incur the Wrath of Kek

Alt-RINOs, Those Who Incur the Wrath of Kek


International criminal and third world advocate Hillary Clinton gave a speech recently denouncing the Alt-Right, in which we were painted as a part of a vast right-wing conspiracy of klansmen, water filter salesmen, and Russian agents working together to elect Donald Trump. Unfortunately, I am yet to receive a suitcase full of money from Vladimir Putin. Instead I am seeing people all over the Internet claiming to be Alt-Right who I’ve never heard of before, but more importantly, a number of them aren’t Alt-Right.

Here are the seven principles of the Alt-Right as defined by yours truly, and here is a repository of related content. To be succinct, the Alt-Right is a big tent of illiberal and identity-based ideologies that are united in purpose in the Anglo countries and Europe to advance the political, biological, cultural, and social interests of White people. This stems from the fundamental Alt-Right view of the world as one of tribal conflicts, not ideological conflicts. It is a post-Cold War moral system that returns to an archaic—and more accurate—understanding of humanity. We take our own side, and we expect other tribes to take theirs. Most already do. And there is nothing unethical about this. Take a deep breath, WEIRD man.

The problem: an influx of people who are Alt-Right in name only (Alt-RINO) are coming across our borders after Clinton’s speech, and we need to be able to figure out who these people are and where they’re coming from. Because a lot of them seem to be identifying with the label just because they like Trump and then doing post-hoc rationalizing to counter the left’s interpretation of the Alt-Right (calling it racist, White supremacist, fringe, hate, etc.). How could this new label I’ve just commited myself to mean something bad? Here’s what the goy who shouted “PEPE” during the Clinton speech had to say to Breitbart:

If you come to this country legally, follow the laws, learn our language, and love the country, you are equal, no matter your color, or religion. Basically alt-right is to separate ourselves from the failing establishment right.

Well folks, that brings us to the first kind of Alt-RINO.

Civic nationalists


Civic nationalism is magic dirt nationalism. It’s the idea that anyone anywhere can be shoved into the blast furnace of America and made into an American. There’s just something about being here that makes you belong here. I mean after all, we’re a nation of immigrants right? (No reference as to where most of them came from before the last few decades). Please invade us, just make sure you adopt our language and love of voting and mindless consumption. Race and religion don’t real; it’s being a good citizen that matters!

When this country becomes “minority-majority” in the 2040s, as it currently is for children under five, it will not be recognizable as a country founded by British people and then populated by waves of pan-European immigration from 1790-1965. The United States will change radically as a result of the third demographic transition. What could be less conservative or nationalistic than letting your people be bred out of existence by foreigners?

Civic nationalists are most certainly not Alt-Right. Nothing they advocate will end the downward trajectory of the United States from a White majoritarian republic (the historical American nation) to a third world shopping mall (Weimerica). It will just make them feel better about their mystery meat grandchildren since at least they wave the flag and speak some variant of English.

The Alt-Right supports ethno-nationalism, not slow death.


These are a kind of civic nationalist, I would argue, except even more into legalism and “muh ideas” than they are about an actual identity. They have a paper fetishism for the Constitution and the US legal system, even when it works against them. For example, the (((Supreme Court))), or the Sanhedrin as I call it, currently has three Jews and five Catholics. Justice Antonin Scalia once suggested that there should be more Protestants on the bench, since America has a lot of Protestants and they are totally unrepresented in one of the most powerful organs of the federal government. Obama’s proposed nominee is (((Merrick Garland))), “a white guy, but he’s a really outstanding jurist.” Thankfully he’s being stonewalled by Cuckgressional Republicans, who are doing something useful for once.

For Constitutionalists, not identity, but legal documents are the source of the nation. Tell me how that works out for you when this happens, because the Constitution has glaringly failed to defend the liberty of our posterity:



Jesus Christ, you are not Alt-Right. A lot of the Alt-Right is ex-libertarian, especially from the Rothbardian/propertarian/ancap milleau. And even those are not mainline libertarians. Do you think Gary Johnson has read Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Democracy – The God That Failed? I like Hoppe. I like using state power to enforce contracts and incentivize good behavior. I like excluding people from my community who I didn’t invite and who are from outside of it in the first place. I think people who vote left-wing and come from the third world should not be made into citizens and given the same right to vote as me, because they will vote to destroy my liberty, my property, and have the state redistribute it to them in exchange for votes. Do you believe in opposing that, libertarian? Or do you think the free movement of goods and labor is as sacred as dude weed lmao?

Just because you think the GOP is icky but have the same moral foundations as a Democrat on issues of race and culture doesn’t make you Alt-Right. Why would it? Alt-RINO.


These are a bit like civic nationalists but even more cucked, especially the non-jewish ones. If you are an interventionist and an Israel-firster who is mad at the current GOP for not being violent enough towards the Arab world and not reaching out enough to the Afro-Latino block and immigration reform, you aren’t Alt-Right. If you think NRO is bad because they try to distance themselves from the Bush years and spend too much time bashing Trump instead of fighting Hillary, you aren’t Alt-Right. If you idolize Ronald Reagan (the godfather of illegal immigration amnesty), you aren’t Alt-Right.

If you think identity politics is dividing us and we just need to come together as Americans (which means nothing to you anyway), you aren’t Alt-Right. The Alt-Right isn’t against identity politics; it is against the double standard of Whites not being allowed to practice any tribal behavior without being treated like Hitler. If we live in a multi-ethnic society where each group is encouraged to be as tribal and factional as possible, why not us?

Philosemites and Anti-Racists

Nah dude. You’re a retard. This is not a free-for-all anti-establishment fuckparty. Even the (((SPLC))) got this right. We’re White nationalists. This is about race. This is about ending the confluence of toxic semitic and marxist influence over White nations in Europe and the Anglosphere. Go educate yourself. We want our own ethnostates and freedom from the politics of racial suicide and multiculturalist anomie, as championed by a long line of leftists and Jewish ethnic activists in Europe and the Anglo countries. We want what Israel, Japan, Egypt, India, China, and over a hundred other countries have. Freedom. And our day shall come.


Finally, if you consider yourself Jewish and Alt-Right—that is to say you identify with a Jewish heritage and agree with the Alt-Right worldview of tribes in conflict and ethno-nationalism as the solution—then the only defensible position for you to take is Zionism. As you are no doubt aware, overseas Israelis have major metapolitical problems. In the United States, they frequently embrace the cause of the Palestinians and intermarry with the goyim, diluting our heritage and yours. Some Israeli politicians refer to this process as a second Holocaust—anudda shoah, if you will. And Israel is under assault by some of the same globalist kayaks as the White world, such as (((George Soros))). You can do the following to help us and yourselves: make aliyah and encourage your friends and family to do the same, serve in the Israeli Defense Force, and run for political office in Israel on a platform of ulta-zionism and normalizing relations with the soon-to-be ethno-nationalist West. Your country, quite frankly, needs you. Its Muslim population is growing rapidly and since the last wave of migration after the fall of the USSR, Israel has been facing less than rosy demographic prospects. You and your millions of overseas kinsmen can help make Israel great again.

A lot of people are going to be calling themselves Alt-Right when they are nothing of the sort. And it is our job to dial ourselves to 11 and show these people we mean business. This is the Overton window shift we have been talking about. Cuckservatism is on its last legs and civic nationalism and right-wing populism are supplanting it. And that’s a good thing. But not good enough. Our goal is to wake people from the American Dream.

Everything changes, and nothing changes. We will just have to recalibrate our artillery and resume fire. Metapolitics is never over.

  • Ralph Hollister

    I don’t care who my neighbors are as long as they carry their own weight. Freeloaders are not welcome.


      Very interesting, might i ask how diverse the neighborhood is that you are living in?

      • poiuyttre

        Sincerely, I prefer to have 10 racially and nationally diverse workmates in the office than 10 homogeneous.

        As long as they are sorted by IQ, and no group’s achievement is beneath the other groups, there will be no envy, sense of inferiority, thus no resentment and aggressivity.

        2 intelligent Chinese, 1 Japanese, 2 North Europeans, 2 South Europeans, 2 Anglos, and the occasional black Latino or whatever provided he/she were exactly as skilled as the others. Much better than 10 intelligent Anglos, and, if this is what diversity were, diversity would be great. Cultural mingling would be great. Putting to good use and joining different types of intelligence (IQ is a good measure, but there’s more than what IQ can measure to what brains can and can’t do, or we’d have 10 composers like Bach in China every year) is/would be great.

        The elites (example: Silicon Valley firms) benefit from diversity.
        The USA, back when their immigration policy consisted in cherry-picking the best minds and brains from the whole world, benefited from diversity (and hugely so).

        The real problems are: low-IQ demographic addictions (no longer needed, since the needed-IQ available jobs bell curve has shifted rightwards, and low-skill works will keep disappearing), and high-IQ hostile ethnic groups, or, as I would word it, super-intelligent madly white-hating ethnic groups.

        These are the two problems with diversity, I don’t see diversity as a problem.

        But the real main problem is whites’ masochism and dislike for themselves. Has it been enforced on their mind, you say?
        Well, yes, but why was that possible?
        Do you think the same kind of propaganda would have any chance in Japan or China, India?
        They tried it on Russia lately, did you see how it worked? It didn’t.

        • Hapa

          I wonder where the white self-dislike comes from? Is that shame and guilt for some very rough handling of natives over the centuries? Lots of subjugation and slaughter of these people – guns, germs and steel under our boots.

          Not hard to imagine the desire for retribution against us whities. Maybe our problem is that our forefathers were just evil, greedy fucks. Think about ol’ Christopher Columbus and what good deeds he done.